Alcohols-buliding-blocks

On March 31, 2008, Geier, Johannes; Lessmann, Holger; Hellriegel, Simin; Fuchs, Thomas published an article.Recommanded Product: 4719-04-4 The title of the article was Positive patch test reactions to formaldehyde releasers indicating contact allergy to formaldehyde. And the article contained the following:

A case of formaldehyde allergy detected by pos. patch tests to several formaldehyde releasers is presented. In cases suspected formaldehyde allergy but the patch test with formaldehyde 1% aqueous remains neg., repeating the formaldehyde patch test may help to clarify the diagnosis especially when unexplained reactions to formaldehyde releasers are observed The experimental process involved the reaction of 2,2′,2”-(1,3,5-Triazinane-1,3,5-triyl)triethanol(cas: 4719-04-4).Recommanded Product: 4719-04-4

The Article related to formaldehyde releaser allergy skin, Toxicology: Chemicals (Household, Industrial, General) and other aspects.Recommanded Product: 4719-04-4

Referemce:
Alcohol – Wikipedia,
Alcohols – Chemistry LibreTexts

On November 30, 2011, Latorre, Nuria; Borrego, Leopoldo; Fernandez-Redondo, Virginia; Garcia-Bravo, Begona; Gimenez-Arnau, Ana Maria; Sanchez, Javier; Silvestre, Juan Francisco published an article.COA of Formula: C9H21N3O3 The title of the article was Patch testing with formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasers: multicentre study in Spain (2005-2009). And the article contained the following:

Background. Formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasers are common causes of allergic contact dermatitis. Objectives. To determine the frequency of sensitization to formaldehyde and seven formaldehyde-releasers. To establish and characterize groups of patients according to the results of patch testing. Materials and methods. We performed a 5-yr retrospective study, in six Spanish hospitals, of patients with pos. patch test reactions to formaldehyde or any of seven formaldehyde-releasers. Results. The most frequent allergens were formaldehyde (1.72%), imidazolidinyl urea (1.05%), quaternium-15 (0.88%), and diazolidinyl urea (0.79%). Patients with sensitization to only formaldehyde had a higher frequency of occupational dermatitis (25%) than patients with sensitization to only formaldehyde-releasers (9.5%). The most common sites of dermatitis were the hands (31.7%) in patients with sensitization to only formaldehyde and the face and legs (31.3% and 24.6%) in patients with sensitization to only formaldehyde-releasers. We found a subgroup of 25 patients who were sensitized to both imidazolidinyl urea and diazolidinyl urea, and only 6 of these (24%) were also sensitized to formaldehyde. Conclusions. The inclusion of imidazolidinyl urea and diazolidinyl urea in the baseline series of the Spanish Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergy Research Group (GEIDAC) should enable better classification of patients allergic to formaldehyde, and could aid in their management. The experimental process involved the reaction of 2,2′,2”-(1,3,5-Triazinane-1,3,5-triyl)triethanol(cas: 4719-04-4).COA of Formula: C9H21N3O3

The Article related to formaldehyde releaser allergy allergen, Toxicology: Chemicals (Household, Industrial, General) and other aspects.COA of Formula: C9H21N3O3

Referemce:
Alcohol – Wikipedia,
Alcohols – Chemistry LibreTexts

On September 30, 2002, Trattner, A.; Farchi, Y.; David, M. published an article.Related Products of 4719-04-4 The title of the article was Cosmetics patch test: first report from Israel. And the article contained the following:

A total of 244 Israeli patients with suspected cosmetic contact dermatitis was patch tested on the upper back with the European standard series and a cosmetic series using Finn Chambers on Scanpor tape. The patches were removed after 2 days, and readings made on day 2 and day 3. A pos. response to one or more allergens in the cosmetics series was found in 80 patients. The most frequent allergens were methylchloroisothiazolinone + methylisothiazolinone, thimerosal, triethanolamine, and octyl gallate. Thus, its is recommended that a cosmetics series be added to the standard series in all patients with suspected cosmetic contact dermatitis. The experimental process involved the reaction of 2,2′,2”-(1,3,5-Triazinane-1,3,5-triyl)triethanol(cas: 4719-04-4).Related Products of 4719-04-4

The Article related to cosmetic contact dermatitis patch testing, Toxicology: Chemicals (Household, Industrial, General) and other aspects.Related Products of 4719-04-4

Referemce:
Alcohol – Wikipedia,
Alcohols – Chemistry LibreTexts

On November 30, 1995, Hermansky, Steven J.; Neptun, Douglas A.; Weaver, Elizabeth V.; Ballantyne, Bryan published an article.Related Products of 2160-93-2 The title of the article was Clinical pathology changes related to cutaneous irritation in the Fischer 344 rat and New Zealand White rabbit. And the article contained the following:

An evaluation of 27 repeated dose cutaneous application studies (9 applications of 6 h over an 11-day period) indicated that several hematol. and clin. chem. parameters may be altered by chem. induced skin irritation. Irresp. of species, values that were generally decreased included Hb concentration, hematocrit, erythrocyte count, and serum concentrations of calcium, potassium, inorganic phosphorus, and creatinine. Values that were increased included the neutrophil and total leukocyte counts. Some species differences were seen; for example, while the platelet count and serum globulin concentration were increased in rabbits only, the serum glucose, sodium, and chloride concentrations were increased in rats only. The mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular Hb (MCH), and serum albumin and total protein concentrations were variably affected. Changes were generally well associated with the degree of cutaneous irritation, but did not appear to be related to the chem. class of the test substances, decreased food consumption, loss of body weight, or systemic toxicity of the chem. The experimental process involved the reaction of 2,2′-(tert-Butylazanediyl)diethanol(cas: 2160-93-2).Related Products of 2160-93-2

The Article related to chem toxicity cutaneous irritation pathol, Toxicology: Chemicals (Household, Industrial, General) and other aspects.Related Products of 2160-93-2

Referemce:
Alcohol – Wikipedia,
Alcohols – Chemistry LibreTexts

On December 31, 1996, Ballantyne, Bryan; Leung, Hon-Wing published an article.Related Products of 2160-93-2 The title of the article was Acute toxicity and primary irritancy of alkylalkanolamines. And the article contained the following:

The acute handling hazards of several alkylalkanolamines were determined by investigating their potential acute toxicity and primary irritancy. Materials studied were N-methylethanolamine (MEA), N, N-dimethylethanolamine (DMEA), N, N-dimethylisopropanolamine (DMIPA), N-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), and tert-butyldiethanolamine (BDEA). All these alkylalkanolamines were of comparable acute peroral toxicity in the rat (LD50 range 1.48-2.83 mL/kg). By 24 h occluded epicutaneous contact in the rabbit, MEA, DMEA and DMIPA were of moderate acute percutaneous toxicity (LD50 range 1.13-2.0 mL/kg), MDEA was of slight acute percutaneous toxicity (LD50 male 9.85 mL/kg, female 10.90 mL/kg), and BDEA of intermediate toxicity (LD50 6.4 mL/kg). Due to differences in vapor pressure the acute vapor exposure toxicity of the alkylalkanolamines to rats varied; MEA, MDEA and BDEA were of a low order of acute toxicity, and DMIPA was moderately toxic with an LT50 of 3.2 h for a saturated vapor atm. exposure. A 4 h-LC50 (rat combined sex) of 1461 ppm was determined for DMEA. All alkylalkanolamines studied, except MDEA, were moderately to markedly irritating and caused variable degrees of skin corrosivity; MDEA caused only transient minor skin irritation. In accord with the skin irritancy results, the eye irritancy from 0.005 mL MEA, DMEA, DMIPA and BDEA was severe, and that from MDEA was slight. Exposure to these compounds has implications for occupational health procedures. The experimental process involved the reaction of 2,2′-(tert-Butylazanediyl)diethanol(cas: 2160-93-2).Related Products of 2160-93-2

The Article related to acute toxicity irritancy alkylalkanolamine, Toxicology: Chemicals (Household, Industrial, General) and other aspects.Related Products of 2160-93-2

Referemce:
Alcohol – Wikipedia,
Alcohols – Chemistry LibreTexts

Zhang, Bin; Yao, Hui; Qi, He; Ying, Xiao-guo published an article in 2020, the title of the article was Cryoprotective characteristics of different sugar alcohols on peeled Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) during frozen storage and their possible mechanisms of action.COA of Formula: C12H24O11 And the article contains the following content:

Sugar alcs., also known as polyols, have been widely applied in food products for their unique properties. In this work, the effect of soaking treatments composed of the sugar alcs. xylitol, sorbitol, erythritol, lactitol, mannitol, maltitol, and isomaltitol on the quality properties of peeled Pacific white shrimp during frozen storage were evaluated. Samples treated with water and sodium pyrophosphate (Na4P2O7) were designated as the neg. and pos. controls, resp. The results indicated that significant improvements were found in thawing, pressing, and cooking loss, myofibrillar protein content, myofibrillar Ca2+-ATPase activity, and textural variables in xylitol- and mannitol-treated shrimp as compared to that of control samples. Water mobility analyses showed that xylitol and mannitol effectively increased the relaxation times T21 and T22 and the percentage of A21 (trapped water) but decreased the percentage of A22 (free water) in muscle tissue. Addnl., the microstructural results indicated that soaking in xylitol and mannitol significantly slowed the damage caused to muscle tissues by large ice crystals. Here, the incorporated xylitol and mannitol mols. presumably replaced water mols. by forming large hydrogen bonds with the muscle proteins, thereby stabilizing their structures in the absence of water while in the frozen state and suppressing the destruction of tissue structure. The experimental process involved the reaction of SweetPearlR P300 DC Maltitol(cas: 585-88-6).COA of Formula: C12H24O11

The Article related to litopenaeus sugar alc storage cryoprotection, Food and Feed Chemistry: Meat, Eggs, Fish, and Seafood and other aspects.COA of Formula: C12H24O11

Referemce:
Alcohol – Wikipedia,
Alcohols – Chemistry LibreTexts

On November 30, 2008, Aalto-Korte, Kristiina; Kuuliala, O.; Suuronen, K.; Alanko, K. published an article.Recommanded Product: 2,2′,2”-(1,3,5-Triazinane-1,3,5-triyl)triethanol The title of the article was Occupational contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. And the article contained the following:

Formaldehyde allergy is common and usually derives from formaldehyde-releasing biocides in cosmetic and other products. To analyze patterns of patch test reactions to formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing compounds and the sources of sensitization. At the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, we screened the patch test files for allergic reactions to formaldehyde and 12 formaldehyde-releasing compounds All patients with contact allergy to any of the substances were included, and their records were reviewed. Between Jan. 2001 and May 2007, we had patch tested 81 patients with formaldehyde allergy and 18 with independent allergy to some formaldehyde releaser. Of the formaldehyde allergies, 60 were new sensitizations, 25 of which were considered to be occupational. The most common source of occupational sensitization was metalworking fluids followed by creams and related products. Exposure to formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in liquid soaps and other rinse-off products was common in both occupational and non-occupational cases. Reactions to formaldehyde-releasing compounds were seen in 79% of the formaldehyde-allergic patients. Occupational formaldehyde allergy was common and occurred in metalworkers, hair-dressers, masseurs, and workers using protective creams, detergents, and liquid soaps. When compared with studies on general dermatol. patients, contact allergy to formaldehyde releasers without formaldehyde allergy was rare. The experimental process involved the reaction of 2,2′,2”-(1,3,5-Triazinane-1,3,5-triyl)triethanol(cas: 4719-04-4).Recommanded Product: 2,2′,2”-(1,3,5-Triazinane-1,3,5-triyl)triethanol

The Article related to formaldehyde contact allergy occupational exposure, Toxicology: Chemicals (Household, Industrial, General) and other aspects.Recommanded Product: 2,2′,2”-(1,3,5-Triazinane-1,3,5-triyl)triethanol

Referemce:
Alcohol – Wikipedia,
Alcohols – Chemistry LibreTexts

On October 31, 2020, Muhialdin, Belal J.; Kadum, Hana; Fathallah, Salahaldin; Meor Hussin, Anis Shobirin published an article.Formula: C8H8O3 The title of the article was Metabolomics profiling and antibacterial activity of fermented ginger paste extends the shelf life of chicken meat. And the article contained the following:

Fermented ginger paste is a traditional condiment in South East Asia used to marinate meat to extend the shelf life and improve the taste. The present study aimed to determine the metabolomics profile of fermented ginger and the effects on the shelf life of chicken meat. Sterilized chicken meat slices were marinated using the fermented and fresh ginger paste and incubated at 8°C to determine the effects on the microbial growth. The bioactive metabolites were identified using 1H NMR based anal. The results demonstrated that fermentation significantly (p<0.05) increased the antibacterial activity of the ginger paste against Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium (97%), Listeria monocytogenes (97%) and Staphylococcus aureus (100%), with the microbial load significantly (p < 0.05) reducing to 4.0 and 4.5 Log10 CFU g-1 in the chicken meat slices marinated in fermented ginger. Fermented ginger paste significantly reduced the pH value, moisture content and water activity of chicken meat slices after the incubation for 2 days at 8°C. A total of 25 metabolites were identified in the fermented ginger paste. These results revealed the potential application of fermented ginger paste to enhance the safety of chicken meat via reducing the microbial load. The experimental process involved the reaction of 3-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid(cas: 621-37-4).Formula: C8H8O3

The Article related to chicken meat ginger paste metabolomics antibacterial activity, Food and Feed Chemistry: Meat, Eggs, Fish, and Seafood and other aspects.Formula: C8H8O3

Referemce:
Alcohol – Wikipedia,
Alcohols – Chemistry LibreTexts

On December 31, 2006, Geier, Johannes; Lessmann, Holger; Becker, Detlef; Bruze, Magnus; Frosch, Peter J.; Fuchs, Thomas; Jappe, Uta; Koch, Patrick; Pfoehler, Claudia; Skudlik, Christoph published an article.Synthetic Route of 4719-04-4 The title of the article was Patch testing with components of water-based metalworking fluids: results of a multicenter study with a second series. And the article contained the following:

Background: Although many allergens in metalworking fluids (MWF) are identified, there are still some MWF components, which are not sufficiently investigated concerning their sensitizing properties. Objectives: To investigate sensitization to 10 frequently used MWF components, which are not part of the established MWF test series, in metalworkers with suspected occupational dermatitis due to MWF. Patients/Methods: Oleyl alc., myristyl alc., dimethylolurea, 4,4′-methylenebis morpholine, imazalil, 1-amino-2-propanol (monoisopropanolamine; MIPA), 2-amino-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol (AEPD), 2,5-bis(n-octyldithio)-1,3,4-thiadiazole, zinc alkyl dithiophosphate and dibenzyl disulfide have been patch tested in 144 patients. Results: 7 patients reacted pos. to the formaldehyde releaser 4,4′-methylenebis morpholine, and 6 of these patients also reacted to formaldehyde and/or other formaldehyde releasers. 4 Patients reacted pos. to myristyl alc. tested at 10% petrolatum (pet.). Addnl., 20 doubtful or irritant reactions occurred. 1 Patient each reacted pos. to oleyl alc., MIPA, and AEPD. None of the other test substances mentioned above elicited any clear-cut pos. reaction. Patch testing with well-known MWF allergens showed proportions of pos. reactions, which were comparable to those from other studies, e.g. 11% to monoethanolamine, 8% to colophonium and 3%-5% to various preservatives. Conclusions: 4,4′-methylenebis morpholine may be an important MWF allergen, although clin. relevance could not be stated definitely in every case. Myristyl alc. should not be patch tested at 10% pet., but at a lesser concentration, due to irritant properties. The experimental process involved the reaction of 2,2′,2”-(1,3,5-Triazinane-1,3,5-triyl)triethanol(cas: 4719-04-4).Synthetic Route of 4719-04-4

The Article related to skin allergy allergen metalworking fluid occupational health hazard, Toxicology: Chemicals (Household, Industrial, General) and other aspects.Synthetic Route of 4719-04-4

Referemce:
Alcohol – Wikipedia,
Alcohols – Chemistry LibreTexts

On July 31, 2016, Li, Xiying; Shi, Bing; Chaikittisilp, Watcharop; Li, Mengmeng; Wang, Yujie; Liu, Yong; Gao, Li; Mao, Liqun published an article.HPLC of Formula: 4719-04-4 The title of the article was A general method to synthesize a family of mesoporous silica nanoparticles less than 100 nm and their applications in anti-reflective/fogging coating. And the article contained the following:

Recent advances in strategies for synthesizing mesoporous silica particle (MSN) have enabled the precise control of its morphol., size, and composition which afford the applications in drug delivery and heterogeneous catalysis. Especially for drug delivery, the size of MSNs <100 nm is a prerequisite allowing for hemolysis effect. However, a general method for the synthesis of MSNs with uniform size distribution <100 nm still remains challenging. Herein, a general method was developed to synthesize a family of aqueous colloidal MSNs with uniform size <100 nm using small organic amines (SOAs) or nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds (NCHCs) as alk. catalysts in the presence of cationic quaternary ammonium salts as organic templates. The size of MSNs can be easily adjusted within the range from 28 to 100 nm by the cooperative effect of the mixed alk. catalysts or using different quaternary ammonium surfactants as templates. Also, texture properties of MSNs including pore diameter and surface area were controlled by selecting different kinds of SOAs or NCHCs. Based on the low refractive index of MSNs, these as-prepared MSNs serve as building blocks and afford an anti-reflective/fogging coating on glass slide through a facile dip-coating method. The experimental process involved the reaction of 2,2',2''-(1,3,5-Triazinane-1,3,5-triyl)triethanol(cas: 4719-04-4).HPLC of Formula: 4719-04-4

The Article related to mesoporous silica nanoparticle monodisperse templating antireflective fogging coating, Industrial Inorganic Chemicals: Bases and Metal Oxides and other aspects.HPLC of Formula: 4719-04-4

Referemce:
Alcohol – Wikipedia,
Alcohols – Chemistry LibreTexts